The virgin diary, or: What Tony Abbott should have said to his teenage girls

The first time my virginity was called into question, I was no older than 12. I had taken my younger sisters to play on the school playground, very close to home, and we were hanging about doing those flips and somersaults that girls like to do on monkey bars (when I think of it now I am amazed by the flexibility my body once had!). Some slightly older boys had appeared on their bikes and interrupted our play by starting a conversation. They didn’t seem at all threatening, just curious and a bit annoying. Even in retrospect, I don’t think they meant anything dangerous.

They had a lot of questions, most of them quite boring, until one asked me if I was a virgin. I confidently said no. He asked if I knew what it meant, but although the meaning was a bit hazy to me, I was too proud to admit any doubt. Perhaps he wasn’t sure what it meant either. In any case, the word virgin was not entirely unfamiliar to me – I had at least come across it as “vergine” in my mother tongue, Italian, and I thought I had a fair idea of its meaning. A virgin, I thought, was a young woman, older than me, with breasts and a woman’s body. I had a very firm concept of myself as still a child, and I reasoned that I was not old enough to be a virgin. If I really thought about it I might even have said that a virgin was a woman old enough to have sex. And that, surely, was not me! Those boys left shortly thereafter and I never saw them again.

A couple of years later I started attending a catholic school and quickly learned what virgin really meant. As the years passed I began to understand the problems associated with the concept of virginity. First of all, virginity was different for males and females. Girls were supposed to stay virgins as long as possible, for strict catholics even until marriage.  However it was a truth universally acknowledged that for boys, the opposite was the case, catholic or not. There was some lip service paid by teachers and priests to the notion of boys restraining their desires until marriage, but no-one really believed it. The fact was that for boys virginity was an embarrassing weight to be got rid of at the earliest possible opportunity. Girls who lost theirs too early were clearly sluts, but eventually even us catholic girls knew it was pretty uncool to wait until marriage to have sex and we’d snigger at the homilies and lectures given on the matter by the teachers and priests. But when exactly was the right time to lose your virginity? Most of us had a vague idea that we’d wait until we were at uni or had finished school. We thought we could plan it.

I was a shy, sheltered girl, so securing my virginity until I was at uni was not exactly difficult. I figured that my time would come and for a long time I did not worry about it. One by one my friends all started having sex. Some were more public about it than others. One old schoolfriend I’d not seen in months raced to catch me between classes to announce with studied casualness that she and her long-time boyfriend had “done it” the previous night (I was surprised, having assumed they’d been having sex all along). Others were more discreet, but they all started on a series of mostly monogamous relationships while I waited patiently. The embarrassment of advanced virginity crept up on me slowly, until I realised painfully that I was now the odd one out. What had once been desirable was now something to be hidden at all costs. I had missed the “right time” to lose my virginity! Had I met those boys from the playground I would have lied to them again, knowingly this time, and accompanied by a deep sense of shame.

I eventually did have sex but if the guy involved guessed he was my first, he thankfully never let on. What really struck me afterwards was that I was exactly the same person I’d been before. I experienced the sense of relief I imagine school boys feel when they lose their “cherry”, but other than that, I was still just me. I could not see why there had to be a word to describe the person I was before having sex. Nothing had changed. And if I was a virgin before, what was I now? Just a young woman. A person. Just me. And it strikes me now that losing one’s virginity is one of those life events which seems huge in anticipation but as time leaves it behind it becomes quite small and of comparatively little significance.

When I heard last week that Tony Abbott had said that girls’ virginity was “the greatest gift that you can give someone”, I was reminded of those priests and nuns from high school that we all ended up sniggering at.  Mr Abbott has been much criticised for his remarks, made in an interview with The Women’s Weekly in response to a question on pre-marital sex. (“Pre-marital sex”: isn’t that a funny little expression too – why do we need a description for the kind of sex that happens before marriage? We don’t start calling it “marital sex” after marriage.) Abbott has his defenders too. They say that he was just being a caring father, that his answer was aimed only at his daughters, and only if they asked, not at all Australian women. That’s what Andrew Bolt says anyway. I would argue that when the leader of the Opposition is interviewed, he knows his comments will be published and he is therefore speaking to the public.

As for being a caring father to his daughters, I don’t have any daughters, but our friends who do sometimes joke about locking them away until they’re 21 (or even older). I never hear such jokes about their sons. The jokes invariably come from the fathers. I suspect many fathers feel a sense of empathy for Mr Abbott. What should he have said to his teenage girls instead? asks Mr Bolt.

So here is what I think a father should advise his teenage daughters, and what all parents and sex-ed teachers should advise teenagers: virginity is meaningless. It is not a gift to give somebody else, nor is it something to feel triumphant about if someone else “gives” it to you. If someone puts their trust in you, that is something to treat with care. It doesn’t matter when you “lose” your virginity, because it won’t change you: you will be the same person after that you were before. What does change you are other things, some of which will come up at the time you first have sex.  But mostly they will come up gradually, sometimes unexpectedly, sometimes painfully. Embrace them and learn from them. These things are (this is neither an ordered nor an exhaustive list): intimacy with another human being, fear of the unknown, regret for mistakes you’ve made, trust in another, desire, power, pleasure, embarrassment, curiosity, boredom, surprise, rejection, elation, disappointment, excitement, loneliness, joy and wonder. And we should always remind our children that sex brings along with it a raft of responsibilities, foremost being protection from disease ranging from minor to life-threatening and from the possibility of pregnancy.

In my opinion, that is what Tony Abbott should have said in his interview with The Women’s Weekly.  But I do wonder how they would have edited it down for convenience, and how it would have been re-reported by the media.

20 Comments

Filed under In the news, Pontifications, Reflections, Uncategorized

20 responses to “The virgin diary, or: What Tony Abbott should have said to his teenage girls

  1. I love this. It should be reprinted in ‘Dolly’ or whatever the young people are reading these days!

    • I remember “Dolly”! That was where we got most of our sex info back in my Catholic high school days so I suspect it is a bit out of fashion now. Hopefully one or two young people will read it here instead.

  2. A beautiful, beautiful post. I’m going to link it to my blog, print it and put it in my undies drawer to use for my cherubs in (hopefully) a long, loooonnnnggg time from now.

    • Thank you Green Mama. I hope we’re all up to the task of talking to our kids when they’re old enough! It’s easy to have good intentions but I suspect I’d better print it out for my underwear drawer too!

  3. Fantastic. This was a great post, Muliercula.

    The media’s been pissing me off with articles like:
    this one in The Age .

    Not noticing too many males coming forward talking about ensuring their “precious gift” remains “unwrapped”.

  4. Or just click on it. You can do that, too. Apparently. Too bloody clever for my own good. Should have stayed a virgin.

    • It is an interesting article – she reminds me of some girls I used to go to school with! Even a little of myself at that age. It’s hard to make your way through all that stuff about reputation when you’re 17. Which is why politicians like Mr Abbott are only making things more confusing for young people by giving their advice on the matter. Must be hell being a teenager at school in leafy, middle-class Melbourne these days…

  5. Pingback: Guest Shoes by @muliercula – A Homage to my Red Shoes « Caveat Calcei

  6. wow – brilliant well written blog – am very glad to have been introduced to it…I think I’m an unusual Mum, I worry equally about my kids starting to have sex, not because ‘its a gift’ but because I think it should involve trust and love and not just a drunk fumble in the back garden with some person you never see again…I’ve fully accepted that any time from 12 onwards for my girl may be the time – as terrifying a thought as that is and i hope it is not so, my boy I’m not so sure – no one ever asks them about that do they? in all those surveys and stuff…
    Sorry long blather…great blog.

    • I’m not sure that love is all that helpful in one’s first sexual experiences, but trust definitely is. That would be the number one criteria for a sexual partner. Another thing to say to the kids… whether they’ll listen to us is another matter! :-)

  7. you are such a great writer and an interesting thinker. looking forward to reading much more.
    xx

  8. I love this. Brilliant. Would that you had daughters who could benefit from your wisdom. I’m putting you on my blogroll. Love your writing.

  9. possiblelinley

    Really enjoyed reading the post. Can you send a copy to Andrew Bolt too?

  10. Pingback: Ninth Carnival of Feminist Parenting « Mothers For Women’s Lib

  11. I couldn’t agree more ! Thanks for saying it the way you do – though I did not grow up Catholic, I did grow up in a fundamentalist Christian household – enuf said! Virginity was of ultimate importance – strange! They completely missed the point. Is there somehwere I can sign up to your blog? I am going to put you on my blog roll – want to read more!

    Marcella

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s